Prioritise meaningful needs
Identify which problems are evidenced, consequential and important enough to justify intervention.
Health innovation strategy · portfolios · adoption
I connect user evidence, portfolio judgement and health-system insight to improve what gets built, funded and adopted.
The problem
Teams can start with a solution before the need is clear, invest before the evidence is strong, or treat adoption as somebody else’s downstream problem. The result is wasted capital, stalled pilots and innovations that do not fit the people or systems expected to use them.
My work focuses on the choices that prevent this: which needs merit action, which innovations deserve backing, and what must be in place for real-world use.
Prioritise the need. Test the investment case. Shape the route to adoption.
My speciality
I work across three decisions that organisations often separate, even though weakness in any one of them can undermine the whole investment.
Identify which problems are evidenced, consequential and important enough to justify intervention.
Test assumptions, evidence and value to improve build, fund and scale decisions.
Identify the actors, incentives, capabilities, partnerships and pathway changes required for use.
Selected work
Current system-level work
Lead, Innovation Environments & Infrastructure · Mental Health Catalyst · IfM Engage
Leading work on the organisational environments, infrastructure, capabilities and care pathways needed to support mental-health innovation across different settings.
Research foundation
PhD research · University of Cambridge
Funded research identifying upstream determinants of user-centred digital-health innovation and how firms can improve need identification and early user involvement.
Portfolio and investment
HealthTech Innovation & Portfolio Consultant · Social Alpha
Advised an impact-focused venture development platform on portfolio management, helping early-stage ventures evidence value to payers and clinical partners.
Platform and programme leadership
Country Head, Strategy & Operations · HITLAB India
Institutionalised India strategy and operations while leading partnerships, programmes and team development across a global health-innovation portfolio.
These roles span different settings. The recurring work is the same: improving what gets attention, investment and a credible route into use.
Earlier foundations
Stanford–India Biodesign
Led multidisciplinary teams through product development, business design, intellectual property and market strategy. Co-invented a patented preventive intervention for musculoskeletal disorders affecting clinicians.
Patent 466813 · Product-market fit across Asia-Pacific, the US and Europe
Cochlear
Co-managed a £258,000 patient-insight portfolio and worked with more than 20 clinical partners to strengthen product integration and adoption.
650+ patients · Voice-of-customer research · Clinical partnerships
Health Mantra
Developed an affordable diabetes-management service for varied socioeconomic groups. The solution was integrated into Portea Medical.
£40,000+ sales growth in six months · Hospital training and adoption
Where I add value
Clarify which problems merit attention, for whom and why.
Assess opportunities, challenge assumptions and make stronger build, fund and scale choices.
Shape platforms, partnerships and stakeholder coalitions around a clear innovation purpose.
Identify the incentives, capabilities and pathway changes required for real-world use.
Ideas
Current questions informing my research, teaching and strategic work.
About
My work has moved from clinical research and biodesign to corporate health technology, venture portfolios, innovation platforms, doctoral research and system-level mental health.
The pattern is not breadth for its own sake. It is repeated responsibility for the choices that determine whether a health innovation is worth pursuing, where resources should be committed and what will enable it to work in practice.
I bring that research-practice perspective to organisations working across innovation funding, programme design, health systems and global delivery.
Contact
Share the decision, evidence and setting. The most relevant conversations involve need prioritisation, portfolio choices, programme design or real-world adoption.